Home

Current News

Biomass Assessment

Unc Mesas Project

Multi-Party Monitoring

Aspen Browse Study

Native Plant Program

Invasive Species Programs

Education & Outreach

Landscape-Level Projects

Unc Mesas

North Rim Landscape

Spring Creek/Dry Creek

Ironhorse

Powerline Projects

A Need for Restoration

Awards

Informational Slideshow

Publications

Executive Summary

UP Facts

Uncompahgre Plateau Facts

Links to Our Partners

Contact Us

Upcoming Events

Site Map


Project selection for funding will be based on four major criteria: 1) Land Health, 2) Coordination, 3) Fiscal Issues, and 4) Community Concerns. A variety of other selection criteria will also be considered. The process for selecting a project is based on the following prioritized criteria.

Priority 1. Land Health Issues.

The project must meet one or more of the following land health criteria:

  • It addresses a land health concern identified in the Uncompahgre Plateau Landscape Assessment Report.
  • It addresses a land health concern identified by the USFS, BLM, or CDOW in a management plan or report.
  • It addresses a priority land health concern identified by the local community.
  • It benefits threatened, endangered or sensitive species.
  • It addresses an emergency land health need (i.e., rehabilitation after fire, flood, drought, blow downs, disease, or insects).
  • It addresses a health or public safety issue related to land health (i.e., imminent fire risk, poor water quality).
  • It helps achieve the overall ecosystem goals of UP.

Priority 2. Coordination Issues.

The project should accomplish one or more of the following coordination criteria:

  • It must comply with all existing laws, regulations, and agency management plans.
  • It achieves multiple agency and community objectives.
  • It provides leverage for additional funding.
  • It is based on sufficient data to make informed decisions and have a high probability of success.
  • It addresses concerns identified through community collaboration and by geographic focus groups.
  • It involves cooperative working partners.
  • It incorporates post-treatment management that helps ensure long-term success.
  • It integrates well with other ecosystem restoration efforts.

Priority 3. Fiscal Issues.

The project should meet one or more of each of the following fiscal criteria:

  • It is cost effective and will use best value contracting.
  • The goal of the project is achievable given the requested funding and the anticipated completion date.
  • There is opportunity for additional funding from outside sources.
  • Cost share requirements are met.

Priority 4. Community Issues.

The project should meet one or more of the following community criteria:

  • It has strong support from the local community.
  • Any potential negative impacts to land users, landowners, or businesses are minimal or can be mitigated.
  • The potential beneficial effects to the community outweigh potential adverse effects.
  • It provides opportunity or incentives for community involvement.
  • It results in a flow of sustainable, marketable forest products
  • It utilizes local work force and benefits local owner/operators
  • The direct economic benefits to the community outweigh any negative economic impacts.

Back to 'Project Selection' Page